But then again i mostly use the 1176 a lot of them lexicon reverb and both emt.
Uad satellite quad vs octo.
I m running a macbook pro 2013 with 8 gigs ram with pro tools 12.
The terms octa core and quad core denote the number of processor cores in a cpu.
So far so obvious.
Uad duo vs quad vs octo.
I have the satellite quad and rarely get into dsp trouble.
It can also be integrated alongside uad 2 pcie dsp accelerator cards uad 2 satellite firewire and apollo twin usb desktop interface for truly scalable mixing power.
Uad 2 satellite thunderbolt 3 is available in quad or octo models with either four or eight sharc processors respectively.
Expandable processing power from quad to octo.
In the short term however there are a few strategies you can use to squeeze the most dsp power out of your existing setup as possible.
Uad 2 satellite usb is available in quad or octo models with either four or eight sharc processors respectively.
The satellite quad can only get 4 5 if you are lucky ssl channel strips up at once vs 9 to 10 for the octo.
In the long run this may be a good indication that another apollo satellite or pcie card would be a good addition to your setup to maximize the number of simultaneous uad plug ins you can use.
Answer to a question that i m often asked online and in person.
It can also be integrated alongside uad 2 pcie dsp accelerator cards and thunderbolt equipped ua audio interfaces including arrow apollo twin and apollo x interfaces for truly scalable mixing power.
So i m currently rebuilding my studio setup.
That had me looking at the uad satellite quad even had me pondering the octo.
If i went with the satellite it wouldn t be until down the road some as my immediate need is a audio interface.
From my personal computer i am primarily just doing mixing.
Octa is eight quad is four.
The audient id22 would be my pick if i didn t go with the apollo twin duo.
Might have been a little long and drawn out but gives you a look at the uad software from uni.
It s not about power.